|
|
Post by nutz4hpotter6 on Aug 4, 2007 23:02:41 GMT -5
Well this theory was totally wrong. I never really believe it but did find it interesting though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Te§§a™ on Aug 6, 2007 21:10:53 GMT -5
At first glance it seems almost plausable. But if you really read into it you find may flaws and things that keep asking questions.
|
|
|
|
Post by daniellover1014 on Aug 24, 2007 14:59:22 GMT -5
I think that it is a very big possibility for her to be a DE, but I dont consider it likely for that to happen.
|
|
whosrab
Hogwarts Prefect
The Weasleys are growing!! [H:3]
Posts: 343
|
Post by whosrab on Aug 30, 2007 4:43:26 GMT -5
Oh my goodness...that is unnerving but now that the last book has been produced i don't think it matters. Her loyalty was unwavering all the more, and all that talk about her being a DE was balderash, although i must admit it was a very very convincing arguement. You see, JK Rowling does this lol, she leaves guns on the walls.
|
|
|
|
Post by nutz4hpotter6 on Sept 3, 2007 19:37:42 GMT -5
At first glance it seems almost plausable. But if you really read into it you find may flaws and things that keep asking questions. That is what I kept doing. I would read it and then have questions or would be able to prove a part of it wrong. It was interesting though. |
|
|
|
Post by iamafan on Sept 16, 2007 3:15:02 GMT -5
i agree,it was the last book.anything was possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by SlytherinPrincesskayXX on Dec 16, 2007 14:24:10 GMT -5
SOZ BUT I THINK NUTS4HPOTTER6 IS RIGHT MCGONNAGALL IS NEVER A DEATH EATER COS SHES BEEN PROTECTING HARRY SCINCE HE STARTED AT HOGWARTS I NO SNAPE DID BUT HE WAS ORDERED TO AND THERE WERE NO GUNS IN THE WALL FOR THIS THEORY!
|
|
